<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Molly&#8217;s Modesty</title>
	<link>http://www.iheartdavids.com/2008/05/mollys-modesty/</link>
	<description>It helps me to say these things aloud, I think.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 12:55:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.iheartdavids.com/2008/05/mollys-modesty/#comment-1633</link>
		<author>admin</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 21:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.iheartdavids.com/2008/05/mollys-modesty/#comment-1633</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I said it was kind of weird. Thanks for articulating the weirdness. 

I guess in my opinion I see these young girls today with "less than perfect" figures and I think of them. When a 14 year-old has an unsightly innertube/muffin top because fashions dictate an exposed midriff, I think Molly's little coverups might be helpful. 

But then again, who am I to say a muffin top on a 14 year-old is unsightly? That's not helping anyone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I said it was kind of weird. Thanks for articulating the weirdness. </p>
<p>I guess in my opinion I see these young girls today with &#8220;less than perfect&#8221; figures and I think of them. When a 14 year-old has an unsightly innertube/muffin top because fashions dictate an exposed midriff, I think Molly&#8217;s little coverups might be helpful. </p>
<p>But then again, who am I to say a muffin top on a 14 year-old is unsightly? That&#8217;s not helping anyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stew</title>
		<link>http://www.iheartdavids.com/2008/05/mollys-modesty/#comment-1631</link>
		<author>Stew</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 19:07:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.iheartdavids.com/2008/05/mollys-modesty/#comment-1631</guid>
		<description>There's something about the site that bothers me. Not the clothes; they're cute and fine. It's the agenda behind the site that I'm not so agreeable about. 

Nothing is wrong with being modest in your dress. It's the way I roll by default. But *encouraging* excessive modesty as a value in itself smacks of paternalism (even coming from a female designer...). Bodies are bad and something we should be ashamed of. Sewing sleeves on sleeveless dresses?? What, is a little upper arm going to turn a girl into Slutty McSlutterson? Does the skin that covers the humerus hold magical powers to turn men into raging rapists? This does a disservice to both men and women.

Every part of a woman's body is sexual, and we MUST COVER UP AT ALL COSTS! 

Oops. Rubbed me the wrong way. Ah well, nobody ever claimed I was without  opinions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s something about the site that bothers me. Not the clothes; they&#8217;re cute and fine. It&#8217;s the agenda behind the site that I&#8217;m not so agreeable about. </p>
<p>Nothing is wrong with being modest in your dress. It&#8217;s the way I roll by default. But *encouraging* excessive modesty as a value in itself smacks of paternalism (even coming from a female designer&#8230;). Bodies are bad and something we should be ashamed of. Sewing sleeves on sleeveless dresses?? What, is a little upper arm going to turn a girl into Slutty McSlutterson? Does the skin that covers the humerus hold magical powers to turn men into raging rapists? This does a disservice to both men and women.</p>
<p>Every part of a woman&#8217;s body is sexual, and we MUST COVER UP AT ALL COSTS! </p>
<p>Oops. Rubbed me the wrong way. Ah well, nobody ever claimed I was without  opinions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
